The tradeoffs, stated plainly.
The decisions that come up in nearly every payments or core-banking evaluation, argued at the level of the category rather than the vendor. Each page says when the other option wins — a comparison that never concedes anything is a brochure.
Pick the one you're facing.
Build vs buy: your core banking stack
Build in-house vs Buy a platformBuild vs buy a core banking stack: the honest tradeoff across time-to-market, control, compliance, maintenance, and cost — and where a platform on your own core fits.
[ 02 ]Whitelabel platform vs BaaS
Whitelabel platform vs BaaSWhitelabel platform vs Banking-as-a-Service: who holds the licence, who owns the app and the data, and where each model locks you in — compared model to model, neutrally.
[ 03 ]Standalone product vs embedded
Standalone product vs Embedded / whitelabelShip your own branded app or embed a widget/SDK in another product? Standalone vs embedded compared across reach, control, integration cost, and revenue — with where each wins.
[ 04 ]Hosted checkout vs building your own
Hosted checkout vs Your own checkoutHosted payment page vs a checkout you build: PCI scope, method coverage, conversion control, and who maintains it as the rules move — compared neutrally.
[ 05 ]Payment gateway vs payment orchestration
Payment gateway vs Orchestration platformGateway vs orchestration platform: what each actually does, when one provider is enough, and when routing across many starts paying for itself — compared neutrally.
Still weighing it?
Tell us the constraint you're actually stuck on — the timeline, the licence, the reconciliation — and we'll tell you which way we'd go, including when that's away from us.
Talk to us